- Chart
- Upturn Summary
- Fund Details
Upturn AI Summary
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF(EQL)
Advisory History & Simulated Performance *
*as per simulation (see disclosures)- ALL
- 1Y
- 1M
- 1W
- BUY Advisory
- SELL Advisory (Profit)
- SELL Advisory (Loss)
- Profit
- Loss
- PASS (Skip)
Advisory Performance History (Simulated)
Upturn Advisory & Investor View for EQL
11/06/2026: EQL (2-star) has a low Upturn Star Rating. Not recommended to BUY.
The ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) provides diversified exposure to the U.S. large-cap equity market by equally weighting the 11 GICS sectors. Unlike traditional cap-weighted funds, EQL prevents any single sector from dominating the portfolio, offering a structured, contrarian approach that automatically sells winners and buys laggards. Its primary strengths include reduced concentration risk and a disciplined rebalancing mechanism, making it an excellent core holding for investors seeking balanced market participation. Primary risks include potential underperformance during periods of narrow, mega-cap-led market growth and broad sensitivity to general economic downturns. This ETF is best suited for long-term investors looking to hedge against single-sector dominance while maintaining full exposure to U.S. equities.
How to Read the Upturn Advisory
The Upturn Star Rating and the current BUY, SELL, or PASS advisory are generated by Upturn’s AI advisory engine based on proprietary signal analysis, price behavior, advisory history, and historical signal performance.
ETF holdings, costs, diversification, valuation, risks, and market conditions provide supporting context about the fund.
Investor Fit
| Investor style | Fit | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth investor | Mixed fit | It provides growth exposure but lacks the concentrated tech momentum that often drives outsized growth returns. |
| Momentum investor | Weak fit | The rebalancing process effectively trims winners, which runs counter to pure momentum strategies. |
| Value investor | Strong fit | The rebalancing process naturally increases exposure to underperforming (often cheaper) sectors. |
| Dividend/Income investor | Mixed fit | It provides broad market exposure but is not specifically optimized for high-yield income. |
| Low-risk investor | Mixed fit | While it reduces single-stock concentration, it remains fully exposed to broader market volatility. |
Investor Profile
Ideal Investor Profile
The ideal investor is a long-term participant looking for systematic exposure to the U.S. economy that avoids the risks of excessive concentration.
Suitability
Best for long-term investors using a passive index-following strategy who value diversification over pure performance chasing.
Risk Profile
| Risk factor | Level | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility | Medium | Equal weighting can lead to higher turnover and potentially different volatility patterns than market-cap-weighted indices. |
| Market risk | Medium / high | The fund is fully invested in equities and will decline in line with the broader U.S. stock market. |
| Concentration | Low | The equal-weight methodology specifically targets low concentration by capping sector influence. |
| Tracking/expense | Low | The fund maintains a low expense ratio and has historically tracked its benchmark with high fidelity. |
| Liquidity | Low | The underlying assets are highly liquid large-cap stocks, ensuring efficient creation and redemption. |
| Business/sector quality | Medium | Investors receive equal exposure to both high-growth and cyclical or struggling sectors. |
Risk Analysis
Volatility
EQL tends to exhibit volatility profiles similar to the broader market, though it can decouple during sector-specific shocks.
Market Risk
As a broad equity fund, it is fully subject to systemic market risk and macroeconomic cycles.
What the ETF Owns
| Exposure Type | Exposure | Weight (%) | Retail Investor Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sector | Information Technology (Equal Weight) | 9.1 | This provides broad participation in tech growth without the heavy concentration seen in market-cap-weighted indices. |
| Sector | Health Care (Equal Weight) | 9.1 | Equal weighting ensures significant exposure to health care regardless of its total market-cap size. |
| Sector | Financials (Equal Weight) | 9.1 | This sector allocation helps balance the portfolio against interest-rate sensitive industries. |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary (Equal Weight) | 9.1 | Exposure to consumer spending trends is kept consistent with other economic sectors. |
| Sector | Other Sectors (Industrials, Energy, etc.) | 63.6 | The remaining sectors are held at approximately equal weights to maintain a balanced exposure across the U.S. economy. |
Analysis of Past Performance
Type ETF | Historic Profit 24.69% | Avg. Invested days 72 | Today’s Advisory WEAK BUY |
Upturn Advisory Rating ![]() | Upturn Advisory Performance | ETF Returns Performance |

Note: This website is maintained by Upturn Corporation, which is an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Such registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. Investing in securities has risks. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. No assurance is provided as to any particular investment return, and you may lose money using our services. You are strongly advised to consult appropriate counsel before making any investments in companies you learn about through our services. You should obtain appropriate legal, tax, investment, accounting, and other advice that takes into account your investment portfolio and overall financial situation. You are solely responsible for conducting due diligence on a potential investment. We do not affect trades for you. You will select your own broker through which to transact. Investments are not FDIC insured, they are not guaranteed, and they may lose value. Please see the Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Disclosure for more information.
All company names, trademarks, logos, and brands are the property of their respective owners and are used for identification and informational purposes only. Use of these names, trademarks, and logos does not imply endorsement by their respective owners.

